Author Archives:

Fukushima's Teetering Unit 4: An Urgent Global Emergency


A Nuclear Sword of Damocles
Because of its importance, we are reposting below an important article from Washington Blog via Global Research in its entirety, including videos.

As the information in the article makes clear, it is not ‘alarmist’ or ‘Chicken Little’ to recognize the nuclear Sword of Damocles hanging by a thread over our species and the entire planetary biosphere.

The lopsided, two-story fuel rod-packed storage pool of Fukushima Unit 4 is 100 feet above the ground, propped up by jacks, its roof blown off by a hydrogen explosion, open to the atmosphere, in an environment too hot for robots, let alone human workers. A 7-point earthquake could knock it over or make it spring a leak. Once the water is spilled a nuclear explosion and fire would follow, potentially spewing 85 times the radiation emitted by Chernoybl around the northern hemisphere and eventually the entire planet. A 7-point earthquake is predicted for the region soon.

This is not just Japan’s problem. This is an international emergency far more immediate than Iran’s mythical nuclear program. It demands coordinated international cooperation and resources be directed at once to head off a potentially global catastrophe of unprecedented proportions. Inform yourself and spread the word. EON Eds.

[ Update: see USGS map of Fukushima fallout in US here. Also: San Francisco Bay Area milk sample has highest amount of Cesium-137 since last June — Almost double EPA’s maximum contaminant level – ENE News. ]

Global Research Editor’s Note
This detailed report by our Contributor Washington Blog must be read very carefully.

The World is at a critical crossroads. The Fukushima disaster in Japan has brought to the forefront the dangers of Worldwide nuclear radiation. The crisis in Japan has been described as “a nuclear war without a war”.

Nuclear radiation –which threatens life on planet earth– is not front page news in comparison to the most insignificant issues of public concern, including the local level crime scene or the tabloid gossip reports on Hollywood celebrities.

The implications of this report must be understood. Public opinion worldwide must be informed so that meaningful actions can be taken without delay in support of the Japanese teams.

Spread the word. Forward this report far and wide. Post it on Facebook.

It is essential to put pressure at all levels of government, nationally and internationally to take all actions necessary to avert an impending catastrophe, which in a very real sense threatens the future of humanity.

Michel Chossudovsky, April 9, 2012

The Fuel Pools of Fukushima: THE GREATEST SHORT-TERM THREAT TO HUMANITY

“Based on U.S. Energy Department data, assuming a total of 11,138 spent fuel assemblies are being stored at the Dai-Ichi site, nearly all, which is in pools. They contain roughly 336 million curies (~1.2 E+19 Bq) of long-lived radioactivity. About 134 million curies is Cesium-137 — roughly 85 times the amount of Cs-137 released at the Chernobyl accident as estimated by the U.S. National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP). The total spent reactor fuel inventory at the Fukushima-Daichi site contains nearly half of the total amount of Cs-137 estimated by the NCRP to have been released by all atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, Chernobyl, and world-wide reprocessing plants (~270 million curies or ~9.9 E+18 Becquerel). It is important for the public to understand that reactors that have been operating for decades, such as those at the Fukushima-Dai-Ichi site have generated some of the largest concentrations of radioactivity on the planet.” (Robert Alvarez, former Senior Policy Adviser to the Secretary and Deputy Assistant Secretary for National Security and the Environment at the U.S. Department of Energy)

The Greatest Single Threat to Humanity: Fuel Pool Number 4
We noted days after the Japanese earthquake that the biggest threat was from the spent fuel rods in the fuel pool at Fukushima unit number 4, and not from the reactors themselves. See this and this. We noted in February:

Scientists say that there is a 70% chance of a magnitude 7.0 earthquake hitting Fukushima this year, and a 98% chance within the next 3 years.

Given that nuclear expert Arnie Gundersen says that an earthquake of 7.0 or larger could cause the entire fuel pool structure collapse, it is urgent that everything humanly possible is done to stabilize the structure housing the fuel pools at reactor number 4.

Tepco is doing some construction at the building … it is a race against time under very difficult circumstances, and hopefully Tepco will win.

As AP points out:

The structural integrity of the damaged Unit 4 reactor building has long been a major concern among experts because a collapse of its spent fuel cooling pool could cause a disaster worse than the three reactor meltdowns.

***

Gundersen (who used to build spent fuel pools) explains that there is no protection surrounding the radioactive fuel in the pools. He warns that – if the fuel pools at reactor 4 collapse due to an earthquake – people should get out of Japan, and residents of the West Coast of America and Canada should shut all of their windows and stay inside for a while.

The fuel pool number 4 is apparently not in great shape, and there have already been countless earthquakes near the Fukushima region since the 9.0 earthquake last March.

Germany’s ZDF tv quotes nuclear engineer Yukitero Naka as saying:

‘If another earthquake occurs then the building [number 4] could collapse and another chain reaction could very likely occur.’

(Unit 4 contains plutonium as well as other radioactive wastes.)

Mainchi reported on Monday:

The storage pool in the No. 4 reactor building has a total of 1,535 fuel rods, or 460 tons of nuclear fuel, in it. The 7-story building itself has suffered great damage, with the storage pool barely intact on the building’s third and fourth floors. The roof has been blown away. If the storage pool breaks and runs dry, the nuclear fuel inside will overheat and explode, causing a massive amount of radioactive substances to spread over a wide area. Both the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and French nuclear energy company Areva have warned about this risk.

A report released in February by the Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident stated that the storage pool of the plant’s No. 4 reactor has clearly been shown to be “the weakest link” in the parallel, chain-reaction crises of the nuclear disaster. The worse-case scenario drawn up by the government includes not only the collapse of the No. 4 reactor pool, but the disintegration of spent fuel rods from all the plant’s other reactors. If this were to happen, residents in the Tokyo metropolitan area would be forced to evacuate.

Former Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Sumio Mabuchi, who was appointed to the post of then Prime Minister Naoto Kan’s advisor on the nuclear disaster immediately after its outbreak, proposed the injection of concrete from below the No. 4 reactor to the bottom of the storage pool, Chernobyl-style.

***

“Because sea water was being pumped into the reactor, the soundness of the structure (concrete corrosion and deterioration) was questionable. There also were doubts about the calculations made on earthquake resistance as well,” said one government source familiar with what took place at the time. “[F]uel rod removal will take three years. Will the structure remain standing for that long?

Asahi noted last month that – if Unit 4 pool gets a crack from an earthquake and leaks, it would be the end for Tokyo.

Kevin Kamps said last month:

Unit 4 storage pool… The entire building is listing including the pool. What they have is steel jacks underneath the pool to try to keep the floor from falling out or the pool from flipping over.

If that cooling water supply is lost, it will be just a few hours at most before that waste is on fire. 135 tons outside of any radioactive containment. They would be direct releases into the environment. 100% of cesium-137 could be released to the environment.

Former U.N. adviser Akio Matsumura – whose praises have been sung by Mikhail Gorbachev, U.S. Ambassadors Stephen Bosworth and Glenn Olds, and former U.S. Deputy Secretary of State and Goldman Sachs co-chair John C. Whitehead – notes:

The unit suffered enormous damage during the tsunami—a hydrogen explosion blew the roof off, leaving the highly radioactive fuel pool exposed to the open air. If another high level earthquake hits the area, the building will certainly collapse. Japanese and American meteorologists have predicted that such a strong earthquake is indeed likely to hit this year.

The meltdown and unprecedented release of radiation that would ensue is the worst case scenario that then-Prime Minister Kan and other former officials have discussed in the past months. He warned during his speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos that such an accident would force the evacuation of the 35 million people in Tokyo, close half of Japan and compromise the nation’s sovereignty. Such a humanitarian and environmental catastrophe is unimaginable. Hiroshi Tasaka, a nuclear engineer and special adviser to Prime Minister Kan immediately following the crisis, said the crisis “just opened Pandora’s Box.”

The current Japanese government has not yet mentioned the looming disaster, ostensibly to not incite panic in the public. Nevertheless, action must be taken quickly. This website over the last year has published a running commentary from scientists explaining why Reactor 4 must be stabilized immediately, who might be able to accomplish such a task, and why the situation has largely gone unnoticed. We believe an independent, international team of structural engineers and other advisers must be assembled and deployed immediately. Mounting public pressure would force the Japanese government to take action. We hope these resources are helpful in educating the public about the crisis that we face.

As the eminent German physicist Dr. Hans-Peter Durr said ten months ago, if the spent fuel pool spills, we will be in a situation where science never imagined we could be.

Matsumura was told that if the fuel pool at unit 4 collapses or the water spills out, so much radiation will spew out for 50 years that no one will be able to approach Fukushima:

Even more dramatically, Matsumura writes:

“Japan’s former Ambassador to Switzerland, Mr. Mitsuhei Murata, was invited to speak at the Public Hearing of the Budgetary Committee of the House of Councilors on March 22, 2012, on the Fukushima nuclear power plants accident. Before the Committee, Ambassador Murata strongly stated that if the crippled building of reactor unit 4—with 1,535 fuel rods in the spent fuel pool 100 feet (30 meters) above the ground—collapses, not only will it cause a shutdown of all six reactors but will also affect the common spent fuel pool containing 6,375 fuel rods, located some 50 meters from reactor 4. In both cases the radioactive rods are not protected by a containment vessel; dangerously, they are open to the air. This would certainly cause a global catastrophe like we have never before experienced. He stressed that the responsibility of Japan to the rest of the world is immeasurable. Such a catastrophe would affect us all for centuries. Ambassador Murata informed us that the total numbers of the spent fuel rods at the Fukushima Daiichi site excluding the rods in the pressure vessel is 11,421 (396+615+566+1,535+994+940+6375).

“I asked top spent-fuel pools expert Mr. Robert Alvarez, former Senior Policy Adviser to the Secretary and Deputy Assistant Secretary for National Security and the Environment at the U.S. Department of Energy, for an explanation of the potential impact of the 11,421 rods.

“I received an astounding response from Mr. Alvarez [updated 4/5/12]:

“‘In recent times, more information about the spent fuel situation at the Fukushima-Dai-Ichi site has become known. It is my understanding that of the 1,532 spent fuel assemblies in reactor No. 304 assemblies are fresh and unirradiated. This then leaves 1,231 irradiated spent fuel rods in pool No. 4, which contain roughly 37 million curies (~1.4E+18 Becquerel) of long-lived radioactivity. The No. 4 pool is about 100 feet above ground, is structurally damaged and is exposed to the open elements. If an earthquake or other event were to cause this pool to drain this could result in a catastrophic radiological fire involving nearly 10 times the amount of Cs-137 released by the Chernobyl accident.

“‘The infrastructure to safely remove this material was destroyed as it was at the other three reactors. Spent reactor fuel cannot be simply lifted into the air by a crane as if it were routine cargo. In order to prevent severe radiation exposures, fires and possible explosions, it must be transferred at all times in water and heavily shielded structures into dry casks.. As this has never been done before, the removal of the spent fuel from the pools at the damaged Fukushima-Dai-Ichi reactors will require a major and time-consuming re-construction effort and will be charting in unknown waters. Despite the enormous destruction cased at the Da–Ichi site, dry casks holding a smaller amount of spent fuel appear to be unscathed.

“‘Based on U.S. Energy Department data, assuming a total of 11,138 spent fuel assemblies are being stored at the Dai-Ichi site, nearly all, which is in pools. They contain roughly 336 million curies (~1.2 E+19 Bq) of long-lived radioactivity. About 134 million curies is Cesium-137 — roughly 85 times the amount of Cs-137 released at the Chernobyl accident as estimated by the U.S. National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP). The total spent reactor fuel inventory at the Fukushima-Daichi site contains nearly half of the total amount of Cs-137 estimated by the NCRP to have been released by all atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, Chernobyl, and world-wide reprocessing plants (~270 million curies or ~9.9 E+18 Becquerel).

“‘It is important for the public to understand that reactors that have been operating for decades, such as those at the Fukushima-Dai-Ichi site have generated some of the largest concentrations of radioactivity on the planet.’

“Many of our readers might find it difficult to appreciate the actual meaning of the figure, yet we can grasp what 85 times more Cesium-137 than the Chernobyl would mean. It would destroy the world environment and our civilization. This is not rocket science, nor does it connect to the pugilistic debate over nuclear power plants. This is an issue of human survival.

“There was a Nuclear Security Summit Conference in Seoul on March 26 and 27, and Ambassador Murata and I made a concerted effort to find someone to inform the participants from 54 nations of the potential global catastrophe of reactor unit 4. We asked several participants to share the idea of an Independent Assessment team comprised of a broad group of international experts to deal with this urgent issue.

“I would like to introduce Ambassador Murata’s letter to the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to convey this urgent message and also his letter to Japan’s Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda for Japanese readers. He emphasized in the statement that we should bring human wisdom to tackle this unprecedented challenge.”

Ambassador Murata’s letter says:

“It is no exaggeration to say that the fate of Japan and the whole world depends on NO.4 reactor. This is confirmed by most reliable experts like Dr. Arnie Gundersen or Dr. Fumiaki Koide.”

Anti-nuclear physician Dr. Helen Caldicott says that if fuel pool 4 collapses, she will evacuate her family from Boston and move them to the Southern Hemisphere. This is an especially dramatic statement given that the West Coast is much more directly in the path of Fukushima radiation than the East Coast.

Will humanity rise to the occasion, and figure out how to stabilize fuel pool number 4 before catastrophe strikes?

Or will modern civilization win a Darwin award for failing to pay attention to the real threats?

For further background analysis, see

GLOBAL RESEARCH’S ONLINE I BOOK ON FUKUSHIMA

Fukushima: A Nuclear War without a War: The Unspoken Crisis of Worldwide Nuclear Radiation
– by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky – 2012-01-25
GR ONLINE READER. The dumping of highly radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean constitutes a potential trigger to a process of global radioactive contamination… Eventually all major regions of the World will be affected.

Persistant Resistance is Fertile – CA's 'Smart' Meter Pushback Chronicles

Two defiant mothers are arrested for blocking 'smart' meter installation trucks in Inverness, CA.


Boulders (or at least rocks) in the Path of the ‘Smart Grid’ Juggernaut
[Scroll down for video]
Northern California – in the service area of energy giant Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) – is one of a growing number of epi-centers of ratepayer resistance to the wireless ‘smart’ meter deployment by electric, gas and water utilities in this country and around the world.

Wireless so-called ‘smart’ meters are just one component of the international ‘smart grid’ project: a top-down, technocratic profit-making plan originating from the elite Davos-based World Economic Forum, and being promoted by the world’s largest consulting firm, Accenture – ‘a global management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company headquartered in Dublin, Republic of Ireland.’

It should be noted that Accenture is a spin-off of the discredited, and now virtually defunct, accounting firm Arthur Anderson, which helped the infamous Enron cook its books.

[ Ed. Note: Mr. James E. McAvoy of Accenture contacted us in response to the above sentence. His e-mail said in part “Accenture does not now, and has never, engaged in the practice of public accounting, and was not involved in the Enron scandal.

From its establishment in 1989 until its incorporation in 2001, Accenture was a separate legal entity and operated independently from Arthur Andersen. In 1990, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission recognized that Accenture¹s predecessor, Andersen Consulting, was a legal entity distinct from Arthur Andersen.

In 2000, in an International Chamber of Commerce arbitration decision, the ICC recognized that the partnership then named Andersen Consulting was a legally separate entity from Andersen Worldwide and the Arthur Andersen firms. The arbitrator also agreed that Andersen Consulting was not a subsidiary or division of Arthur Andersen or Andersen Worldwide. The decision confirmed that Andersen Consulting was never owned by Arthur Andersen — so there was no spin-off or parental link.

Under the terms of the ICC ruling, Andersen Consulting was given until December 31, 2000 to adopt a new name. We began operating under the Accenture name in January 1, 2001. Accenture went public on the New York Stock Exchange in July 2001.

Regarding the Enron scandal, and Arthur Andersen’s role in it, the matter became public in the fall of 2001. According to the Grand Jury Charges filed against Arthur Andersen, “on or about October 16, 2001, Enron issued a press release announcing a $618 million net loss for the third quarter of 2001.

That same day, but not as part of the press release, Enron announced to analysts that it would reduce shareholder equity by approximately $1.2 billion. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which investigates possible violations of the federal securities laws, opened an inquiry into Enron the very next day.”https://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/enron/usandersen030702ind.html

This timing makes clear that Accenture was not in any way involved in the Enron accounting scandal.

In addition, on November 7, 2003 the federal court in Houston approved the settlement of the class actions on behalf of shareholders and employees of Enron. Accenture was not a party to the settlement agreement, and under the terms of the final settlement with the class plaintiffs, Accenture was released from all claims that were brought by these plaintiff groups. This was final and conclusive proof that there was no connection between Accenture and either Arthur Andersen or Enron.”

We thank Mr. for this clarification and are happy to make this correction and retraction. Eds. ]

Despite the utilities’ outrageous assertion that wireless ‘smart’ meters – with all their proven risks to safety, security, privacy, billing accuracy and human health – can be installed on people’s homes without their consent, ratepayer rebellion has been strong and is growing.

This video post is an impressionistic montage – not meant to be definitive – of just some of the people and actions so far contributing to the establishment of an ‘opt-out’ program in the PG&E service area. It should give viewers in other states and service areas empowering evidence that ‘Persistent Resistance is Fertile.’ It carries the still-unfolding story through January 2012.

Since then, the movement is turning its attention to a ‘Fight the Fees’ campaign – why should people have to pay not to be harmed by a plan about which they were not consulted, and to which they have not consented? Stay tuned…

For more info
StopSmartMeters.org
EMFSafetyNetwork.org
SmartMeterHelp.com
SmartMeterDangers.org

=======
To help keep EON’s work going, please check out all the support options on our Donation Page or you can also send a check made out to EON to EON, POB 1047, Bolinas, CA
Or…just:

Building Japan-U.S. Nuke Free Solidarity – The 3/11 Truth Movement Grows

This original sketch of Prof. Akira 'Lazy Cat' Murakami by StuArt was published in the Bolinas Hearsay News. https://hearsaynews.org


Uncensored Fukushima Report Direct to West Marin, CA
Reprinted from: Guest Column – Pt. Reyes Light – March 22, 2012
By Rachel Gertrude Johnson & Mary Beth Brangan – EON

“The planet can’t endure another Three Mile Island, Chernobyl or Fukushima.” Prof. Akira Murakami

Immense releases of radioactivity from Fukushima were at first blown eastward from Japan towards the West Coast of North America. In 1986, Chernobyl radiation caused a spike in bird, human elder and infant mortalities. After Fukushima, a similar spike in infant mortality was observed in Seattle, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Oakland, according to Center for Disease Control numbers.

Chernobyl was a single-reactor explosion estimated to have caused one million excess deaths since 1986. By 2000, fewer than 20 percent of Belarus children were considered healthy. Fukushima has already seen three melted reactor cores and 3,108 intensely radioactive fuel rods. It’s all still emitting radiation into the air and ocean, with no end in sight.

Tokyo, with a population of over 32 million, has radioactive hot spots at a distance of 150 miles from Fukushima. A professor emeritus at the University of the Ryukyus, Katsuma Yagasaki, said on November 12: “Children, pregnant women and those wanting children in the future should be evacuated from Tokyo.”

Yet the government has hardly taken any protective measures. Racehorses were evacuated, but children were not. People are still living within a 19-mile radius from the stricken reactors because they can’t afford to move without government help. Russia evacuated everyone from the more sparsely populated Chernobyl area.

What the Japanese government did do was raise the legal allowable radiation exposures to levels higher than those used for adult male nuclear workers. This when children, especially young girls, are up to seven times more sensitive than adults. Already 30 percent of children in the Fukushima area have nodules on their thyroids—a rate unheard of by doctors.

Food is spot-checked, loosely regulated, and residents have caught the government lying about radiation measurements. A campaign of “Buy Fukushima, Eat Fukushima” pressures people everywhere with the charge that they are traitors if they choose not to “eat Fukushima.”

Japan is a conformist society and its people are being ordered to stay silent. The government, the media, compliant college professors and medical doctors are down-playing the dangers and hiding facts.

But increasing numbers of mothers, aided by the Internet, independent media and international activists, are becoming engaged. A network of volunteers in Japan is working with MIT professors to take radiation measurements and provide the data to the public. Many residents and grocery store owners have invested in high-tech devices to provide reliable information about radiation levels in foods to concerned mothers.

Despite having suffered the devastation of being nuclear-bombed, Japanese residents in past decades bought into an “Atoms for Peace” campaign, illustrated with cartoon characters with reactors in their chests. The country wanted to emulate the superior technology of its American vanquisher, but years later it’s clear to many Japanese people that the campaign’s real purpose was to provide business opportunities for GE and Westinghouse as well as a cover for the production of weapons materials. (In 2006, Tochiba bought the nuclear power section of Westinghouse.)

Still, as Professor Akira Murakami from Japan’s Akita University puts it: “The planet can’t endure another Three Mile Island, Chernobyl or Fukushima.”

Last week the Ecological Options Network (EON) hosted Murakami for a series of events and media interviews as part of a U.S. tour to report the uncensored news from post-Fukushima Japan.

The EON team, a Bolinas-based nonprofit, has a long history of anti-nuclear activism. Responding to the ongoing nuclear disaster has been a big part of our work for the past year. On November 7 we visited the Japanese Consulate in San Francisco, where we presented an international petition of 7,000 signatures asking the Japanese government to stop its plan to distribute and incinerate radioactive rubble all over the nation.

Mary Beth Brangan (left) and Rachel Gertrude Johnson (center) of EON and Kimberly Roberson (right), founder of the Fukushima Fallout Awareness Network (FFAN) meet with Japanese embassy officials.

We had been asked by Japanese activists to help ask their government to stop this unconscionable plan of spreading radiation to even uncontaminated areas of the country instead of containing it as much as possible.

Jim Heddle, co-director of EON, videotaped us at the consulate. The video was posted on YouTube and was translated into Japanese, garnering over 15,000 views in the first week. [See viewers below. ] As result, Murakami contacted us and asked if he could visit while he was here for events related to the anniversary of Fukushima. We were honored and hosted him at successful events in Bolinas and Berkeley.

Now Professor Akira Murakami and other Japanese citizens are pleading with us to shut down our nuclear reactors. Twenty-three U.S. reactor stations have the same defective design as those in Fukushima and California’s Diablo Canyon and San Onofre nuclear reactors are surrounded by multiple earthquake faults and lie in tsunami zones.

Professor Akira 'Lazy Cat' Murakami from Japan's Akita University has traveled to South Korea, Viet Nam, New York and the San Francisco Bay Area working for international solidarity for a nuclear free future. Photo: Rachel Gertrude Johnson

Artist, photographer, and long-time nuclear free activist Rachel Gertrude Johnson is an EON team member. Media activist Mary Beth Brangan is EON Co-Director. Reach them both at Info@EON3.net.
Professor Murakami prefers his friends call him ‘Lazy Cat’ because “Cats are never too busy doing unethical and destructive things like building nuclear reactors. And the jazz artists Fats Waller and Cab Calloway I admire called themselves cats.”

Fukushima Solidarity Movement Grows – A Planetary Issue, link to the video on YT: Fukushima Solidarity in San Francisco

The video in Japanese translation – with over 15,000 views is here:
【海外市民団体の見る日本の汚染瓦礫受入問題】制作:EON

=======
To help keep EON’s work going, please check out all the support options on our Donation Page or you can also send a check made out to EON to EON, POB 1047, Bolinas, CA
Or…just:

SMUD "Smart" Meter Opt-Out Policy Discussion 2-29-12

Screen shot from SMUD website.


Caution! Slow Down! –
Decision-Makers At Work

Below is an audio-only excerpt of the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) Integrated Resources & Customer Services Committee Special Meeting Feb. 29, 2012 in which a proposed ‘smart’ meter opt-out policy was discussed.

This excerpt begins at 00:53:30 of the full meeting audio recording which is currently on-line at https://smud.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=16&clip_id=811 .

The board members and staff attempt to formulate policy for those customers who, ‘for some unknown reason’ (as the chair puts it) want to opt-out of wireless meters.

It makes you wonder what part of the words ‘privacy,’ ‘safety.’ ‘security,’ ‘over-billing,’ ‘hackability,’ ‘electro-magnetic pollution,’ ‘tax-payer-financed corporate boondoggle’ ‘science-based decision-making’ and ‘democratic choice’ they don’t understand.

As Sandi Maurer of the EMFSafety Network puts it:
https://emfsafetynetwork.org/?p=7284

SMUD shenanigans
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) is implementing a smart meter opt-out program that’s intentionally designed to intimidate and discourage customers from opting opt. This audiotape is a unique inside look into industry plotting against their customers.

SMUD is charging $127 upfront and $39.40 per month, and they want to cut off customer rights to opt out by Dec. 31, 2012. They plan to only notify those know who’ve already complained, which is 2,500 of their 600,000 customers. SMUD will not post about the smart meter opt out program on their website.

Even though SMUD is very concerned about their ‘reputational risk’ at [01:51:54] the directors make fun of people who don’t want utility smart meters on their property.

One director says, “The $166 upfront will convince them they can really afford a lot of tin foil hats” [laughter]…Another director says, “But they are already wearing them!” Listen here: https://youtu.be/RuIPSX7FYBE

In closing Director Posner says, “The less that’s said about this, the better off we are.” The last thing they want is a social media campaign that exposes them as unfriendly to their customers.

Are you a SMUD customer? Do you know people who are? Please let them know about this.

Sandi Maurer
EMF Safety Network
PO Box 1016
Sebastopol CA 95473
www.emfsafetynetwork.org
twitter: emfsafetynet
FB: https://www.facebook.com/pages/EMF-Safety-Network/199793306742863
707-824-0824
Stay Informed-Join the EMF Safety Network mailing list:https://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/d.jsp?llr=p4lm7vfab&p=oi&m=1105614745583

=======
To help keep EON’s work going, please check out all the support options on our Donation Page or you can also send a check made out to EON to EON, POB 1047, Bolinas, CA
Or…just:

New Resistance to Nuclear Totalitarianism

Nuclear Ablolition - the REAL way to save the unborn babies. A graphic from the (partially) successful anti-nuclear movement of the '80s. Courtesy Rachel Gertrude Johnson.

As published in the March 15, 2012 Point Reyes Light

New Resistance To Nuclear Totalitarianism

by James Heddle – EON – the Ecological Options Network

Inconvenient Reality
Nothing debunks the delusional corporate fantasy of a nuclear-powered future like the ongoing global disaster still radiating from Fukushima, the one-year anniversary of which was marked last Sunday with massive demonstrations in favor of nuclear abolition around the world.

It took just 18 days for the Fukishima fallout to circle the globe, create hotspots in North America and Europe, and reach the Southern Hemisphere, according to the United States Geological Survey.

Within ten weeks, infant deaths spiked 35% in San Francisco and Seattle, and 48% in Philadelphia, according to a study by Joseph Mangano and Janette Sherman based on CDC (Centers for Disease Control) statistics.

West Coast soil, milk and produce are still showing contaminated readings according to the UC Berkeley School of Nuclear Engineering. As recently as mid Feb. elevated levels of Cesium 134 and 137 were detected in other foods, berries, soil, water, etc..

Nuts for New Nukes
Nevertheless, the Obama Administration and its nuclear industry backers continue to push for a so-called ‘nuclear renaissance’ paid for by tax-dollar loan guarantees and rate-payer surcharges. Obama’s NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) is freely issuing license extensions aged reactors that should already be in mothballs.

In effect, its a nuclear bailout that socializes the costs and risks and privatizes the profits.

That’s because nuclear energy cannot survive in a ‘free market environment.’ Wall Street won’t invest. Insurers will not insure. Democratic choice will not choose it – if given half a chance.

Truth and Nukes Don’t Mix
It can not survive in a transparent, democratic environment either. As Robert Jungk’s classic 1979 book The New Tyranny: How Nuclear Power Enslaves Us showed, because of its vast ‘security’ vulnerabilities, nuclear energy is, at its core, a fundamentally totalitarian technology, requiring secrecy and authoritarian social controls to the max.

Already, in the face of mass public uprisings across the globe and the growth of the Occupy Movement here at home, power holders are moving to criminalize dissent with the passage of laws like the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) and HR 347, the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011. Will they be applied to anti-nuclear protests and non-violent civil disobedience actions?

Rather than acting in the public interest with strictly-enforced policies based on science, so-called ‘regulatory agencies’ like the NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) and the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) consistently fulfill their core mandate, which is to promote – not impede – the spread of nuclear energy technology.

Thus the internationally coordinated campaign to tamp down transparent reporting on the real human, environmental, planetary impacts of nuclear disasters like Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima.

Then there’s the inconvenient fact that nuclear power generation is inseparably joined at the hip with its Siamese Twin, nuclear weapons production and proliferation – has been from the gitgo of the ‘Peaceful Atom’ propaganda campaign.

A Dormant Movement Stirs – ‘Occupy Nukes?’
Despite significant successes in the ’70s and ’80s, the transnational nuclear abolition movement has been quiet of late. Until, that is, the Fukushima wake-up call, the warhead wagging at Iran and the rise of the ‘occupy movement(s).’ Will the awakening Beast of Public Dissent include abolition of nuclear power and weapons in its change agenda? Will Americans stand for the imposition of technocratic, totalitarian nuclear socialism disguised as ‘the only technology that can save us from Climate Change?’

Will they be fooled by the fallacious claims that nuclear energy is ‘carbon free,’ when it is in fact carbon-intensive at every stage of the nuclear cycle from mining to milling to transport to storage, and depends on ‘outside power’ from coal and gas plants to cool its fuel storage pools? Not if a resurgent international anti-nuclear movement can help it.

In the bellwether state of California successful activists in the ‘70s and ‘80s rolled back a plan for dozens of reactors lining its coast. They enacted a law – which still stands today – prohibiting the building of more nuclear reactors until a solution for nuclear waste storage has been found. Now, more that 20 groups have come together in the newly-formed Nuclear Free California Network. Its goal: permanently closing down the state’s remaining nukes at Diablo Canyon and San Onofre – both in earthquake and tsunami zones, just like Fukushima. The NFCN’s Fukushima anniversary declaration is here.

James Heddle co-directs EON, the Ecological Options Network with Mary Beth Brangan. Blog: eon3EMFblog.net E-mail: jim@eon3.net

=======
To help keep EON’s work going, please check out all the support options on our Donation Page or you can also send a check made out to EON to EON, POB 1047, Bolinas, CA
Or…just: